Compliance & regulation
Schrems II
2020 ruling by the Court of Justice of the EU (case C-311/18) that invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield and imposed strict conditions on transferring EU personal data to US-based platforms, including news comment systems.
Schrems II is the shorthand for the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling C-311/18, delivered on 16 July 2020. The ruling invalidated the EU-US Privacy Shield framework that until then governed transatlantic data flows, and imposed a far stricter set of obligations on any EU operator transferring personal data to the United States.
For news publishers running EU-based readers’ comments on US-based platforms, Schrems II is the legal headache that re-opened the comment-vendor conversation in 2020-2022.
What changed
Before Schrems II, an EU publisher using a US-hosted comment system (Disqus, OpenWeb, Coral) could rely on the Privacy Shield as a self-certifying mechanism. The CJEU said : not enough. Specifically :
- The Privacy Shield was invalidated immediately. Operators relying on it had to find another legal basis.
- Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) remain a possible basis, but require a case-by-case assessment of whether the destination country (the US) actually provides protection equivalent to the EU.
- The case-by-case assessment is the publisher’s burden, including evaluating US surveillance laws (FISA 702, EO 12333) that may compel the US vendor to disclose EU data.
In practice, this means : if you run comments on a US-hosted system and your DPO does their job, there is a paper trail of risk assessments to maintain, with non-trivial liability if the assessment is wrong.
The 2026 state of play
A new EU-US Data Privacy Framework (replacing the Privacy Shield) was adopted in 2023. It is in force but actively litigated, with a likely “Schrems III” ruling expected to challenge it.
For publishers who want a stable answer that does not depend on the next CJEU case, the simplest path is to host comments inside the EU with an EU-controlled vendor. That removes the entire question of cross-border transfer, SCC assessments, and US surveillance exposure.
Why this matters for the vendor choice
This is one of the most concrete differences between Logora and US comment platforms :
- Logora, EU only (OVH, France). No cross-Atlantic data transfer. Schrems II does not apply.
- Disqus / Viafoura / OpenWeb, US-headquartered or US-hosted. Schrems II applies. SCC assessment required.
- Coral (Vox), open source. The data residency is whatever you choose to host on. If you host in the EU, Schrems II is moot.
Related concepts
- GDPR, the framework Schrems II operates inside
- Data Processing Agreement, Article 28 GDPR
- First-party data
See the Logora vs Disqus comparison for how Schrems II shows up in vendor selection.